How Democracies Die

Discovery 1
Stop authoritarians by making sure
they never come to power.

21st Century Dictator Methods:
Pre Cold War-Military Coup
Post Cold War-Win Elections, then take control

Two change in the US nomination process
opened a door for a modern day US demigod.
Through the 1968 election, party leaders picked he candidate at a convention.
This smoked room process did not always result in appropriate candidates, but it did keep extremists out.
By 1972, primaries, conducted over many months, became binding.
The filtration process was gone. Authoritarian had an easier path to the Presidency.
The Democratic Party created super delegates who can vote for anyone, hopefully,
to act as a gatekeeper by refusing to support extreme candidates.
Of course, they could abdicate this responsibility and overlook candidate violations.

Democracies failed in
1920's Italy, 1930's Germany, and 1990's Venezuela.
There, political party leaders, hoping to tap into a demagogy's popularity,
made and eventually lost, a Faustian-bargain.
The US has had a few politicians, especially during war, who were not limited by their party.
President Lincoln had a free hand and a civil war was needed to maintain our constitution.
The Roosevelt's lead a long list of authoritarian presidents

Discovery 2
Our constitution alone is not enough
to prevent authoritarianism from destroying the fabric of our democracy.

Two Norms of Democracy are required for stability.
They are the soft Guard Rails Norms of Democracy.

a. Mutual toleration: public and private acceptance of an opponent's legitimacy.

b. Institutional forbearance: under utilization of one's power
by accepting the other party's legitimacy and not following the letter of the law.

Problem: Politian's are throwing forbearance to the wind.
Note: Fights to the death brought down many 1930' European Democracies

c. Historical Analysis: Over a Rocky Road, U.S. Soft Rails Democratic Norms grew slowly.
Hamilton and Jefferson were bitter political enemies.
Both felt the other side would destroy the Republic.
President Washington began presidential norm development.
But these failed during the run-up to, and conducting of, the Civil War.
After a few decades, the Guard Rail norms returned.
No Impeachments, No Court Packing, Judicious use of Filibusters and
Presidents often refrained from acting unilaterally by bypassing Congress and the courts.

Discovery 3
Six Democratic Norms, If Abused, Could Bring Down Our Democracy!

Discovery 9.
Some politicians were not accepting forbearance.
Any tool to stop the opposition from destroying America was legitimate.

The problem is not that we elected a demigod.
The problem is we did so when our Guard Rail Norms are becoming unmoored.

Discovery 10. Trump Authoritarian Strategies
used to Consolidate power.

Capture the Referees
During week one, Trump demonstrated striking hostility toward
our law enforcement, intelligence, ethics and court referees.

He demanded loyalty and compliance from many of his Agency Directors:
He pressured FBI-Comey to drop investigations of recently departed NSD-Flynn.
He pressed DNI-Coats and CIA-Pompeo to intervene in the Comey investigation.
He personally intervened with DNI-Coats and NSA-Rogers wanting them
to release statements denying the existence of his collusion with Russia.
Both refused. He controversially fired Comey.
One other FBI director had ethical problems and was uncontroversial fired.
He fired Manhattan US Attorney Preet Bharara for continuing his investigation
of money laundering activities which were reportedly getting close to Trump's inner circle.
His reactions to the Mueller Investigation were at best, controversial. Please Share!

Sideline Key Players

Attacks on the media for being the
enemy of the people because hey broadcast fake news, and conspiring against him.
These were followed by threats to change the libel laws
to use antitrust actions against CNN
to block the Time-Warner merger,
to challenge the license of NBC, and other networks.
To date Trump's threats have resulted in no action.

Rewriting Rules Against Opponents

He called for bolstering Republican majority strength in the US Senate by
changing archaic Senate rules including tie Filibuster.
The filibuster t was only eliminated for Supreme Court nominations
which allowed for the Neil Gorsuch confirmation.

He most antidemocratic move may have been creating the
Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity
to uncover election fraud perpetrated by illegal immigrant voters.
Independent studies had show almost no election fraud.
States refused to hand over election data.
He disbanded the commission.

Through 2017, Trump has repeatedly bumped up against the guard rails,
but "he did not break through them."
He did not cross over to authoritarianism.

Editor's Note: I do not know which is most intriguing
that he openly tried to bring back Jim Crow laws
that he thought his attempt to disenfranchise voters might work
that it represents his inability to accept reality
that like many of his actions, it caters to his base

Appendix 1. Partisan Polarization Caused by Fear and Loathing Erode the Guiderail Norms of Democracy In 1960, four or five percent of both parties reported they would be displeased if their child married into the other party. Today it is fifty percent. In 2017 forty-nine percent of Republicans and fifty-five percent of Democrats say the other party makes them afraid. We have not seen this kind of party hatred since the end of reconstruction. This is not normal liberal/conservative polarization about health care and taxes. Today, polarization is about Race, Religion and Way of Life. See The 4G's of Politics Political leaders must protect the constitution. But, Polarization has frayed this process in much of the Western World.
2. Future Possible Post Trump Scenarios Swift Democratic Recovery as Trump, [like most populist leaders], loses public support or is impeached of resigns. But Trump is a result, and not the cause, of building Polarity. A pro-Trump ultra conservative GOP maintains control of the presidency, the U.S. Congress and a vast number of state governments. [Is the Republican control of state governments the result of a lack of Institutional Forbearance. Was requiring relegiouse companies to pay for abortion insurance required. Gaining solid control of the Supreme Court could result in changes that result in durable white majorities. Opposition could cause dramatic political stability. Political Polarization will continue to grow.
3. Who Controls Democratic Politic Four theoretical traditions of the study of American politics Majoritarian Electoral Democracy, Economic-Elite Domination, Majoritarian Pluralism and Biased fffllPl uralism Each predicts influence over public policy: average citizens; economic elites organized interest groups, mass-based or business-oriented. Empirical research We use one statistical model to contrast theoretical predictions against each other. We used a unique data set that includes measures of the key variables for 1,779 policy issues. Multivariate Analysis Indicates Independent Group Impacts on U.S. Government Policy Substantial Influence: Teconomic elites and organized groups representing business interests. Study support for theories of Economic-Elite Domination and Biased Pluralism. Little or No Independent Influence Study Does Not Support Majoritarian Electoral Democracy or Majoritarian Pluralism Source: Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens (Cambridge.org) Editor's Comment: Because the Christian Right and NRA are made up of average citizens, how can mass-based interest groups, "have little or no independent influence." Return How Democracies Index
Editor's Thoughts Most Americans look at America through Rose Colored Glasses. Democracy, like Capitalism, has a Cycle-a Polarity Cycle when Democracy Brakes Down. Polarity Cycle 1 was the period before the Revolution after which it peaked, and civility return as both Democracy and her Guard Rails Norms matured. The Era of Good Feelings, associated with President Monroe (1817–1825) was characterized by the dissolution of national political identities. Polarity Cycle 2 began gaining steam with the growth of the abolition movement. Both Mutual Toleration and Institutional forbearance forged a the compromise to pass the 1854 Kansas Nebraska Act but it left in an aftermath unhappiness and a Bleeding Kansas. Eventually Democracy broke down, a Civil War resulted, and the nations democratic ideals were restored. The military maintained peace in the South as one-part Republican Northern Oligarchs maintained dictatorial controls. Polarity Cycle 3 A Populist Era and a Progressive Movement erupted during the Gilded Age. Some would say many average citizens were poorly represented as the Supreme Court protected property rights over human rights. Polarity Cycle 4 The passage of the 1965 Civil rights Act began the latest polarity cycle. It accelerated with the Great Society Program and then Roe Wade. Civility, which had been reasonable for a century, began to decrease. Global Growth the Rise of Populism is could somewhere on the 4th cycle
Media Divides Our Country See U.S. Civility
Is Fake News a Problem?

Our Growing Urban Population May Create Political Difficulties