Educational Change Abstract 1)
P. Drucker
emphasize what learners do well 2)
A. Kohn homework doesn't help young
students 3) T. Cowen best students special,
others motivated
4) Harvard
College 2013 courses about life
1)
Peter Drucker
believed "Students Should Have
Studied What They Do Well" "Delivering literacy--even on the
high level appropriate to a knowledge society--will be an easier task
than giving students the capacity and the knowledge to keep on learning,
and the desire to do it."... "All it requires is to make
learners achieve. All it requires is to focus on the strengths
and talents of learners so that they excel in whatever it is they do
well." But schools do not do it. They focus instead on a learner's
weaknesses."
The New Realities pages
236 and 237. Peter thinks that student who do
poorly with math should not be let anywhere near
algebra. This should make students happier but
remember algebra teachers need jobs. 2)
Alfie Kohn
"In
fact, there isn’t even a positive correlation between, on the one hand, having younger children do
some homework (vs. none), or more (vs. less), and, on the other hand,
any measure of achievement. If we’re making 12-year-olds, much
less five-year-olds, do homework, it’s either because we’re misinformed
about what the evidence says or because we think kids ought to have to
do homework despite what the evidence
says."
Homework: An Unnecessary Evil? ... Findings from New
Research
3)
Tyler Cowen
believed
education can create potentially valuable workers by helping them
improve their value by using smart machines and that these two are
stronger
complements than ever. Students
may not be able to calculate like computers but we can teach students to
be better readers of character and emotion and to be the best
interpreters of the masses of information provided by the behavioral
sciences and big data. Not all students need to do programming but they
need to easily make the most of technology. He sees educators as
motivators and online managers rather than as a professor. From
Average is Over,
2013 by Tyler
Cower
Could
a majority on workers hurt by
Geekability
add to A. Greenspan's fear of unrest? 4)
Harvard originally
emphasized rhetorical principles, rote learning/drilling
1869–1909 Number/variety of
classes multiplied, lecture system supplanted recitation, students
permitted a free course choice 1909–33 A system of “concentration
and distribution...” with general examinations
and tutorials was introduced. 1933-53 Breadth emphasized
by first general education curriculum 1971–91
Courses chosen from seven areas 2013
Required courses
connect to life beyond college |
Return on
Investment Analyzed Abstract
5
P. Krugman
increasing
wage premium for higher
education over 6) L. Thurow small payoff from
little bit more
education 7)
F. Pryor and
D. Schaffer
poor graduates got low level jobs 8) C.
Murray more investing in our best and brightest
9)
A. Greenspan education reform
will take
many years
5)
Paul Krugman
"When asked to make economic comments
as if he were looking back on 1996 from 2096..." Paul
mentioned
"...the devaluation of higher education." "Or
consider the panic over downsizing that gripped America in 1996. As
economists quickly pointed out, the rate at which Americans were losing
jobs in the nineties was not especially high by historical standards.
Why, then, did downsizing suddenly become news? Because for the first
time white-collar, college-educated workers were being fired in large
numbers, even while skilled machinists and other blue-collar workers
were in high demand. This should have been a clear signal that the
days of the ever-rising wage premium for people with higher education
were over, but somehow nobody noticed."
The Accidental Theorist and Other Dispatches from the
Dismal Science 201
6)
Lester Thurow
stated "Education is a very lumpy investment where often there is little or
no payoff from having a little bit more." ..."There are big returns to
the first years of education (the education where one gains literacy) and
big payoffs to the last years of education (a college or graduate degree
where one distinguishes oneself from the pack) but only small payoffs to
those years of education that move the individual from somewhat below
average to somewhat above average." 283
The Future of Capitalism: How Today's Economic Forces Shape
Tomorrow's Worlddata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/99435/9943567a03aeacd7d45cc4ae209700941559f310" alt=""
7)
F. Pryor and D. Schaffer feel "It is those
college-educated workers with functional literacy little better than the
average high school graduate..."
"...
who end up in these lower-level jobs." from
Whose Not Working and Why
8)
Charles Murray tried
to encourage more investing in our best
and brightest in his 1994 book
Bell Curve: Intelligence and Class Structure in American
Life.
He later reinforced this meritocratic system with
"HALF OF THE CHILDREN ARE BELOW AVERAGE,
TOO MANY PEOPLE ARE GOING TO COLLEGE, AMERICA'S FUTURE DEPENDS ON HOW WE
EDUCATE THE ACADEMICALLY GIFTED, ABILITIES VARY."
9)
Alan Greenspan wrote
we can't
forget
about the middle. "The cost of educational egalitarianism is doubtless
high and may be difficult to justify in terms of economic efficiency...".
Some achieve more easily at far less cost, than others. "Yet there is
a danger in a democratic society in leaving some children out sync with its
institutions. Such neglect contributes to exaggerated income concentration,
and could conceivably be far more costly to the sustaining of capitalism and
globalization in the long run. ." "Much of our skill shortage can be
resolved with education reform. But that will take years."
The Age of Turbulence: Adventures in a New World
published in 2007 by Penguin Group, pages 406 and 407 |