NFL Super Bowl Dynasties |
Championships |
Division |
Conference1 |
SB |
SB Scores |
SB Points |
Cheating Points |
|
Team/Years |
Titles |
Record | Record | Score1 | Real Cheats | ||
1. New
England |
13 |
8 +
5 = 13 games played |
6 and 3 |
20>17 SL, 32>29 Ca 24>21 Ph, 14<17 NY 17<21 NY, 28>24 S, 34>28 At 33<41Ph, 13>3 LAR |
215 - 201 = 14 | 27 |
8 Team/NE |
Should a weak division cause a lower ranking? |
|||||||
2. San
Francisco |
13 |
5 + 4
= 10 games |
6 and 0 |
26>21 Cin, 38>16
Mi,
23 >16 Cin, 55 >10 D 49>26 SD 9<31 |
200 - 120 = 80 |
37 |
9 Team /SF |
Should SF be changed because of large point spread dominance & using two quarterbacks? | |||||||
3.
Pittsburgh #1 |
7 |
4 + 1 = 5 games |
4 and 0 |
16>6 Min,
21>17 Dal 35>31 Dal, 31> 19 LA |
103 - 73 = 30 |
40 |
10 Team/PIT |
Should Pitt gets the nod over Miami because playoffs were more difficult with new 1978 Wild Card? |
|||||||
4. Miami |
4 |
2 + 1 = 3 games 72, 73, 74 |
2 and 1 72, 73, 74 |
3<24 Dal, 14>7 Was,
24 > 7 Min |
41 - 38 = 3 |
30 |
10 Team/MIA |
Should loss of 3 offensive stars to World Football League after 1974 season affect ranking? | |||||||
5. Green
Bay |
2 |
2 + 0 = games |
2 and 0 |
35>10 KC 33>14 Oak |
68 - 24 = 44 |
27 |
7 Team/GB |
Should 4 Pre SB conference titles 60, 61, 62, 65 & and 3 NFC championships move them up ? |
|||||||
6. Dallas #1 |
11 |
6 + 5 = 11 games |
2 and 3
|
13<16 B,
24>3 M 17<21 P, 27>10 D 31<35 P |
112 - 85 = 27 |
22 |
8 Team/DAL |
Are Loses to B. Colts and great Pit plus outscoring opponents enough to move up over GB, Mia? | |||||||
7.
Washington |
4 |
4 + 1 = 5 games 83, 84, 87, 88, 92 |
3 and 1 83, 84, 88, 92 |
27>17 M, 9<38
LA 42>10 D, 37>24 B |
115 - 89 = 26 |
31 |
9 Team/WAS |
Was call over Pittsburg as they opposed the great SF dynasty plus a tough division correct? | |||||||
8.
Pittsburgh #2 |
10 |
4 + 4 = 8 |
2 and 2 96, 06, 09, 11 |
17<27 Dal,
21>10 Sea 27>23 Ari, 25<31 GB |
90 - 91 = -1 |
||
Should 8 champion appearances, 3rd most to NE and SF, move them up? | |||||||
9. Dallas
#2
|
6 |
3 + 1 = 4 games 93, 94, 95, 96 |
3 and 0 93, 94, 96 |
52>17 B, 30 >13 B 27 >17 P |
109 - 47 = 63 | ||
Is 3-0 in SB and loss to SF better than P's 2-2 but 8 conference championship games? | |||||||
10. Oakland |
4 |
2 + 4 = 6 games |
2 and 0 77, 81 |
32 >14 Min 27 > 10 Phi |
59 - 24 - 35 |
||
Does only 2 Super Bowls lower them to 10 even though they lost to great Miami and Pittsburg teams? | |||||||
Washington |
4 |
3
+ 1= 4 games 83, 84, 87, 88, 92 |
3 + 1 = 4 games 83, 84, 88, 92 |
27>17 Mia,
38 >9 <38 Oak 42 >10 Den, 10 >7 |
88 - 72 |
||
Should they go ahead of Washington? | |||||||
12. Buffalo
|
5 |
4 + 1
games 89, 91, 92, 93, 94 |
0 and 4 91, 92, 93,94 |
19<20 NY, 24<37 Was,
17<52 Dal, 30<13 D An NFC winning strake of 6 was eventually extended to 12 with a B missed FG. |
18 |
5 Team/BUF |
|
13.
Minnesota |
11 |
3 + 1 = games 74, 75, 77, 78 |
0 and 3 74, 75, 77 |
7<24 Mia, 6<16 Pit, 14<32 Oak Why didn't dominating division help as it seemed to help NE and SF? | 23 |
5 Team/MIN |
|
14. LA Rams |
7 |
1 + 4 =
games 75, 76, 77, 79, 80 |
0 and 1 80 |
19<31 P Should losses to great NFC teams Min, Dal Min, Dal and Pit teams keep them off list? 1 Cheats as of 2015 except for NEP, PHIL and KC |
14 |
3 Team/STL |
|
KC |
5 |
2 +1 18,19. 20, 21 |
1 and 1 19, 20 |
31>20 9<31 |
17 |
4 KC |
|
AFC NFC nfl.com/superbowl provided by textbooksfree.org |