Global
Populism in the 21st Century
Thanks to
Experts:
Mark Blyth,
Adam Tooze,
Francis Fukuyama
1. Neoliberal's Caused Financial Collapse 2. Democracy Failures Caused Latest Popularism 3. Understanding Right and Left Populism 4. Populism is a Reset Mechanism See Global Economic Growth and the Rise of Populism
|
Part 1 Neoliberal's Caused Financial Collapse I. Free Market Neoliberal Economic Orthodoxies WrongA. Finance does affect real economy. B. Finance system can falter. C. Many economist wrong because of politics. see Fake News Warning 7
II. Real Economy Trade Imbalances did not cause the 2007-2008 FINANCIAL CRASH A. The earlier Dotcom Bubble Crash did not cause a banking crises because investors took the loss. B. World trade imbalances, the Balance of Financial Terror were not the root cause the crash. 1. U.S. negative trade balance, as many predicted, did not cause assets and a dollar crash. a. As of 6/18 both have appreciated. b. See The New Financial Geopolitics: Post-Cold War Geopolitics in a World of ‘Long and Low.’ 96 min
2. Loans to Greece from
Germany's trade surpluses
were not the problem III. Almost all banks were very highly leveraged with substantial short term $ borrowing and Euro collateral needed for daily operations A. When Lemans $180 billion over-nigh funding needs were not met by the International Funding Market, the entire market crashed. 1. Worldwide credit flows stopped and ATMs would soon be empty. 2. Bad housing loans were not the problem, rolling over short term daily funding dollar needs with poor mortgage debt as collateral immediately would quickly crash the entire financial system.
B. Credit stopped Credit-default swaps created to safeguard the resulting low credit rating housing loans were exempted from regulation by the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act . It repealed banking industry safeguards provided by the Glass-Steagall Act.
4. Few banks had dollar
reserves to meet the needs
of the banking and corporate world.
5. Walls Street's model
of an extremely leverage wholesale
IV. Is FED Involvement in
a Geopolitical World Appropriate? V. Stability Requires Dollar Supremacy
A. World trade is stable because the world, through
Europe's
banks,
completes the
B. Dollar investments are dependent on high Intellectual
Property
2. These profits are politically dependent on
intellectual property rights C. Distribution of these profits has resulted into an increase inequality of income. D. Trump's disrupting this process has many academics apprehensive. Source Crashed: How a Decade of Financial Crises Changed the World with Adam Tooze
The New Financial
Geopolitics ─ Europe: Helper, Spoiler, Risk Generator? See Documentary Of The Week: Steve Bannon At Oxford 2 hr video
Part 2
Democracy
Failures Caused Latest Popularism I. Development of Illiberal DemocracyA. Causes 1. Foreign Policy Failures of Developed Democracy enhanced by U.S. foreign policy failures i.e. Middle East wars 2. Non-Liberal Democracy success, especially China 3. Poor Liberal Democracy Performance i.e. economic slowness, immigration concerns, wealth accumulation B. Definitions, nominal 1. States: monopoly on the legitimate use of force. from Max Weber States are about Power! 2. Rule by Law: sovereignty sets the law i.e. China 3. Rule of Law: sovereignty responsible to same laws as the governed. Laws limit power. 4. Democratic Accountability requires free political parties with guarantee substantive accounting and a governments that serves the entire population, not just the rich and the poor. Liberals missed this effect of their policies.
Everyone Got More, Some Just Got More More Than Others!
1. Generate tremendous power limited by the rule of law and is democratically accountable 2. Patrimonialism: rulers own political system, resources , distribute wealth Who You Know 3. Neo-Illiberal States:
look democratic, limited representation,
leaders follow the money D. U.S. Failures
at State Building b.
Ukraine: got a liberal democracy from the
Orange Revolution of 2004-5, c.
India: Very democratic but can't
progress to a modern
state because it d.
Greece: got a democracy in 1974 but developed into a
Clientelism
where See Crisis of Capitalism Understood 11 min video
|
|
II. Three Main Forces Are Blowing Up Global Politics Steve LeVine Axios summary by author/editor Walter Antoniotti antonw@ix.netcom.co A Trio of independent disruptions Immigrants, globalization, and establishment Leaders/institutions created dissatisfaction. America's 1 dissatisfaction Spread to Europe causing two years of volatile pubic fury. Unpredictable disruption to Europe and Western Culture is possible. Status and Social Cultural Apprehensions eventually led to disruptions.This caused effected groups to lash out in a tribal like response. An End to a Post WW II U.S. Led Moderation is seen by some to be causing 1. Great power conflict returning to early Cold War levels 2 Declining world wide economic prosperity All three disruptions could last years Axion reported here, here and here.Optimistic leaders thought and even hoped Trump, Brexit, or something else would help moderate continued disruptions. Disruption modification related to Trump, Brexit, and immigrants will be difficult.1. No opposing stability force seems forthcoming 2. An aging and shrinking developed world's population reinforces disruptive forces. 3. AI is increasing worker employment anxiety. 3. Climate change is increasing leader concerns.
See
European Threats 8/18 Editor's Thoughts: Is it Possible This is About Self Esteemed?
Would a more Federalist Approach decrease the animosity
|
|
Summarized of Understanding Right and Left Populism by Samir Gandesha an Associate Professor in the Department of the Humanities and the Director of the Institute for the Humanities at Simon Fraser University. by 1. Growth of Populism Right-wing populist parties in Austria, Hungary, and Poland
Also in Erdogan's Turkey
2003, Modi's India 2014, Trump's American
2016, Left-wing populism
The 2011 Tahrir Square generated
Arab Spring
was short lived Latin America Bolivarian, Venezuela Bolivia and Argentina
Focus on two populism helps understand the
difference between
Empirical study by Norris and Inglehart (2016)
emphasized
Theoretical account by Ernesto Laclau (decades) saw an
“equivalential chain”
2. Populism: Economic Insecurity or Cultural Backlash?
Three distinct elements 2) authoritarianism vs. 2) liberalism 3) nativism vs. 3)osmopolitanism
Two distinct axes: economic and cultural Three approaches
1) the rules of the game
Two causes.
Norris and Inglehart argue that the latter is the most convincing
argument:
One wonders whether the authors don’t seriously underestimate the threat
right-wing 3. Neoliberal globalization is comprised of four processes:
1) accumulation by dispossession
Together they have increased economic
insecurity
and cultural anxiety Anxiety from neoliberal globalization has ammunition from right and left populists.
Neither Norris and Inglehart nor Laclau adequately account for
such insecurity
“the people” are differentially deployed by right and left and they
themselves Right populism defines "the people" as those confronting an external enemy.1) Islamic terrorism 2) Refugees 3) European Commission, 4) International Jewish Conspiracy ... Left populism defines “the people” as social structures/institutions 1) state and capital that thwart its aspirations for self-determination 2) allows hospitality towards the other
Right populism
defines the enemy
in personalized terms Populism is not an economic distribution complaint, It is not just about wage stagnation and loss of jobs It is about disempowerment, social exclusion, unfairness, and humiliation. Many Trump Populists seek recognition,
having a meaning,
from M. Sandel: Populism, Trump, and the Future of Democracy See Discussion Important Question: is
Kantian Morality Enough for the Public Sector,
Should public discussion go beyond safe
and delimiting morality
Should respect for work and be part of the discourse? Should competing conceptions of the "good life" be on the table of public discussion?
Update from Ian Bremmer
Populism in Europe & America 1/24/19 Editor's Note: Michael wants more that Kant. Kant is enough. Michael Aandel is a lot of
Charles Murray who is basically correct,
Extreme conservatives want too much control, extreme liberals want no control Summary of
Summary Insecurity may need more attention by populist theory. These are key to understanding the difference between right and left forms of populism
Related Studies
Nazism And Neoliberal Mythmaking |